Sustainability in Fashion
Throughout our research this year for Rogue Basics’ articles, we discovered a common theme: environmentally friendly fashion.
Influencers across the globe proudly shared that the majority of their 2024 Fashion Week looks are sourced from thrift stores or the depths of their closets. Likewise, industry powerhouses, such as Stella McCartney and Vivienne Westwood, have made sustainable clothing a priority with every runway debut.
The last time sustainability was this “trendy” was the early 2010s. During this era, many brands made the very public announcement that they would be changing their business models to solidify sustainability as a top priority.
These brands, like H&M and Zara, still proudly flaunt their environmentally friendly clothing to this day. However, further research revealed that these two “well known brands’ supposedly sustainable collections… are in the greenwash danger zone…”, according to Greenpeace. H&M and Zara are far from the worst of it, though.
After learning this, I couldn’t help but wonder- if brands can move on from the “trend” of sustainability as quickly as consumers- why is sustainable fashion important then? Does it really make a difference either way?
Environmentally Conscious Clothing: The Dangers of Fast Fashion
Sustainable fashion and ethical clothing impact various aspects of our lives. Arguably, the most well known aspect it impacts is climate change. The United Nations Alliance for Sustainable Fashion even conducted a study on it. The results revealed that “the fashion industry is responsible for as much as 8% of global greenhouse-gas emissions”.
There still seems to be a disconnect, though. Afterall, what does 8% even look like? According to The Wall Street Journal, it looks like “more than 100 billion garments” being produced annually; a number that has, and will continue to, grow exponentially.
National Geographic explains “three-fifths of all clothing is estimated to end up in landfills or incinerators within a year of production- that can translate to a truckload of used clothing dumped or burned every second.” This has become such a problem that the UN has classified a landfill in Accra, the capital of Ghana, as an “environmental and social emergency”. The landfill is reportedly “60% clothes and 65 feet high”.
This overconsumption began “between 2000 and 2014, [when] clothing production doubled and consumers began buying 60% more clothes…”, according to National Geographic. A surprising statistic that turns alarming after a study by Feeding America revealed that “one in three… families found it difficult to afford basic household necessities…” during that same time period.
Currently, the cost of living crisis is severely affecting 40% of Americans, according to Statista. Yet, as of 2024, The Wall Street Journal reports, “the average garment is worn only 10 times before being discarded, often ending up in the trash”.
How Sustainability Affects Consumers
The lack of sustainable fashion negatively affects the everyday consumer as well.
Renewcell, a Swedish startup, “launched a new material made from recycled textiles in late 2022,” according to The Wall Street Journal. Thanks to their chemical process, the new material is more durable than the mechanically recycled fibers commonly used within the industry. This new material is made by breaking “old textiles down to the level of individual molecules from which strong, new fibers are made. These can be recycled indefinitely via the same process.”
With Renewcell offering a material proven to be more beneficial to consumers, as well as the environment, what brand wouldn’t jump at the opportunity? Especially if they’ve still yet to fulfill decade-long passionate promises of sustainability.
Well, unfortunately, “while some big retailers, including [H&M, Zara, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger], were enthusiastic backers,” The Wall Street Journal reports, “not enough brands committed to buying its material.” As a result, Renewcell filed for bankruptcy last month- just 2 short years after launching. Tricia Carey, Renewcell’s chief commercial officer tells The Wall Street Journal, “[they] hit a brick wall in talks with other big brands… [that expressed] excitement and [agreed] to pilot projects, only to balk at placing commercial-scale orders.”
Fast Fashion vs Secondhand
How can sustainability be prioritized when there are no affordable options, though? An argument often made when the time comes to buy new clothing. Unfortunately, fast fashion is typically far cheaper, and not everyone has the privilege to choose where they shop. Therefore, we must also view sustainability from a class and accessibility perspective.
Sustainability shaming should not include those who cannot afford or have the means to access sustainable products. No matter a person’s economic class, though, there are ways that everyone can practice sustainability.
Sustainable fashion doesn’t just mean buying from approved brands. The most sustainable fashion choice is actually not buying new at all. Enter secondhand shopping! Thrifting is a great way to ensure you avoid directly supporting harmful brands. It’s also a great way to try fast fashion trends that were once overpriced; though, that’s not to say secondhand shopping should be used as a fast fashion alternative!
Ethical Clothing and Sustainable Garments
Sustainability, climate change, and economics are heavy topics. None of which the everyday consumer feels they have much control over. The government is in charge of the country’s economic wellbeing, and corporations have a much bigger impact on the environment than one polyester shirt does.
While all of that is true, I still fear we do not realize our power as everyday consumers. The everyday consumer is actually what the majority of businesses rely on. The working class, the average person, the everyday consumer- whatever mediocre title is bestowed upon us does not negate the fact that we are mighty and the voice of the majority. Our voices matter! And by voices, I mean money.
90% of the time a brand does not care if their public perception is bad so long as it doesn’t effect their revenue. Cheaper is always better for business, and the cheapest option a brand can get away with is typically the one they’ll choose. Yet all this money saved rarely results in quality products for consumers or acceptable working conditions for employees.
Believe in your power as a consumer! Consumers can force a company into change, if only we persist. If we accept appealing promises and projected plans for years down the line, there will never be further progress. If we accept the bare minimum, we will only ever receive the bare minimum. A brand’s goal is only to keep a consumer satisfied- not happy.
It’s time we start asking questions and demanding action. Don’t wait for a brand to confirm that a boycott is working- they never will. When shopping new, support these ethical brands instead- but most importantly, shop secondhand!
FAQ
If the product you’re buying is vintage or from a previous season, do a quick Google search to ensure the product is legit. Online sellers will commonly scam buyers by listing items that they never even had in the first place.
Similarly, sellers, both in person and online, will list pieces at inflated prices. Googling the item before purchasing can ensure you pay a fair price.
Closely review images and item descriptions so you’re aware of any product flaws.
Know the return policy before you buy!
Sizing in the fashion industry has never been consistent, so beware that one brand’s size 42 may be another’s 32! Sizing can even differ within a brand, especially if you’re shopping for items that were made in a different decade.
Online thrifting can get you some absolute gems! Just take a peak at the featured college for some inspiration.
The RealReal
Depop
Ebay
Facebook Marketplace
ThredUp
Thrifted.com
Poshmark
Beyond Retro
Retro and Me
Vestiaire Collective
Stella McCartney
Vivienne Westwood
Mother of Pearl
Prada Re-Nylon
Eileen Fisher
Brother Vellies
Levi’s
Oddli
Reformation
Frankie Collective
House Of Sunny
Nobody’s Child
Omnes
Honest Basics


Leave a Reply